We work with companies that run 2, 5, sometimes 10+ warehouses on the same WMS. Some are expanding. Others have been multi-site for years and are looking to rationalize how it all holds together.

In both cases, the same friction points come up. Comparing performance across sites takes too long. Moving stock between locations requires too many workarounds. Maintaining several environments costs more than it should.

Let’s be clear. The question behind all of this is always the same: if we operate multiple warehouses, what architectural choice prevents us from creating long-term complexity, integration debt, and KPI blind spots?

Descartes paid $115 million for 3GTMS in April 2025. The TMS market is moving fast, no centre.

The 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant describes the shift. Transport is converging with broader logistics execution. End-to-end orchestration. Decisions flowing across the supply chain instead of sitting in silos.

In an unsettled TMS market, a WMS with transport functions no longer has to hesitate in transport conversations. A mature WMS today (one with a clean IT architecture, native transport functions and the ability to call specialists through APIs) runs more of the transport stack than most people realise.

This article draws on a conversation with Alban Cocolon, a WMS expert at Hardis Supply Chain. What WMS transport functions cover. Where the line with a dedicated TMS sits. Why the fragmented TMS market opens the door.

A real shift has happened in the supply chain conversation since the start of 2026.

In the past few months, we’ve seen a wave of LinkedIn posts on what their authors call “logistical debt”. The comment threads are even more telling than the posts themselves — dozens of Supply Chain Directors, COOs and warehouse managers chiming in, recognizing a pattern they had been living with for years but had never put a name to.

Reverse logistics covers all the processes and activities involved in managing, inspecting, and processing goods shipped from the point of consumption (or sale) to the warehouse.

In other words, it’s the conventional logistics flow but in reverse.

Whether it involves the management of e-commerce returns, or or environmentally hazardous waste, reverse logistics poses major challenges for companies—but also opens up a number of opportunities. A warehouse management system is essential for organizations looking to deploy reverse logistics processes at scale and reduce the associated costs.

That’s the reality – and it’s increasingly apparent in LinkedIn news feeds, expert reports, and recent studies on cybersecurity. For the professionals working at the heart of IT security, a change is coming or perhaps it’s more accurate to say that something new is now expected of them. They are no longer solely tasked with managing servers or dealing with CVEs; instead, they must contribute to their group’s resilience and strategic value. This value is increasingly dependent on the CIO’s ability to act as a unifying force, rather than merely as an IT operator.

Communicating to reduce the risk 

Cyber risk goes far beyond technical equipment; today, it involves cognitive and organizational factors. Attackers rely on persuasive techniques to get an employee to click, a manager to break a rule, or senior management to take urgent action. CIOs are now up against strategic experts in the art of influence. So when it comes to messages, judgment calls, and human decision-making, that’s exactly where CIOs must act to reduce risk across the company.

We are seeing a growing number of communication training courses aimed at CIOs and CISOs. That’s no coincidence. More than a mere soft skill, communication is now a prerequisite: a new skillset to draw on to change habits, create automatic responses, normalize doubts, and encourage reporting.

And just like any good advertisement, it’s not the information that matters: it’s the storytelling and the impression it makes. Its power doesn’t lie in what it explains, but on the impact it has. We are more likely to remember Christelle from the marketing department, whose salary was paid into the wrong account on two different occasions, than the email from the IT department urging us to look out for email scams.

This isn’t about telling people what to do. The first step is to create a lasting memory to counteract the element of surprise when the situation arises again.

A good story is never unique 

The impact of a message depends as much on its content as on its adaptability to its audience.

The real key to engagement lies in the skill of telling the same story while tailoring it to various audiences.
 To engage different employees, the CIO must be able to translate risk into impacts and emphasize why it matters to each party. When speaking to the executive committee, the reactions to the statement that “We have discovered an RCE vulnerability on a server that supports critical activity” won’t be the same as the reactions when hearing that “Protecting these servers is a Level 1 priority which requires swift action to ensure customer satisfaction, avoid significant financial penalties, and maintain the support of our investors in the event of an incident.”
In one example, information is shared; in the other, a decision becomes possible. As the interface of the entire system (management, business lines, subsidiaries, IT, partners), the CIO must identify what triggers a reaction and, through a trickle-down effect, sparks action. The CIO’s role is no longer limited to deploying solutions or enforcing rules. Instead, it involves using the right tools, at the right level, to elicit appropriate behaviors, transforming isolated actions into a shared culture of risk.

The issue is bandwidth, rather than motivation

The ability to communicate effectively is becoming an integral part of the CIO’s role in risk management. Storytelling doesn’t replace tools or safeguards, but gives them collective reach, influencing behavior far beyond the world of IT.

One major issue still needs to be addressed: the bandwidth required to tackle these issues in roadmaps and diaries that are already pretty full. There is genuine awareness that risk management must be carried out at company level. But CISOs are already under pressure and most do not feel sufficiently supported by management. The answer may lie in working with a third party to address these issues in the long term.

A CEO records a message announcing that the company is entering administration. A senior executive issues a transfer order during a video call. An employee receives an urgent voice message. Except none of this is real.
Once confined to entertainment, deepfakes are now a serious cybersecurity threat, having gone mainstream thanks to easy-to-use online tools.
How can you tell real from fake? What risks do they pose to businesses? And how can you defend against them?

Deepfakes: Understanding the technology behind the threat

Developer working at night, screen reflection in his glasses

A deepfake is an image, video, or audio file generated by artificial intelligence (AI) to convincingly mimic a real person.

Deepfakes generally fall into two categories:

  • Asynchronous deepfakes, where a video or audio recording is manipulated before being shared (such as a fake message from a senior executive).
  • Real-time deepfakes, which are created through “face swapping,” a technique that overlays someone’s face and/or voice live onto another speaker. An attacker can use this method to impersonate a company executive during a video meeting, making the fraud highly believable.

One striking example was the 2023 viral image of Pope Francis wearing a white puffer jacket. Despite it being an absurd scenario, many people believed it was real because of the image’s photorealistic quality. This case perfectly illustrates how the realism of deepfakes blurs the line between truth and falsehood, making even the most unlikely situations appear genuine.

AI-generated image depicting Pope Francis wearing a white puffer jacket

At the core of deepfake creation are GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks), a system where two AI models compete: one generates synthetic content, while the other evaluates it against real data. Through repeated confrontations, the quality of the fakes improves, making them increasingly difficult to detect.

With each new iteration, the generator fine-tunes its output until it can deceive the discriminator. And the more the system learns, the more realistic—and harder to spot—the deepfakes become.

Why deepfakes pose a cybersecurity threat

Data analyst interacting with a digital interface

How deepfakes are used in cyberattacks

Cybercriminals use deepfakes in a variety of ways to achieve different goals. Just a few seconds of a public recording, such as an interview, a speech, or a podcast, are enough to clone someone’s voice and trick a target into believing they’re speaking to a superior or partner.

These attacks exploit cognitive biases linked to trust and urgency, making them especially hard to spot.

Fake transfer orders: Millions stolen in a flash

In 2024, a company lost $25 million after an employee was duped during a deepfake video call: on screen, a fake CFO and fake colleagues convinced him to authorize fraudulent transfers to Hong Kong.

Another striking case occurred in the same year, when criminals used voice-cloning technology to imitate a company executive and persuade a bank manager to transfer funds. In total, $35 million dollars were stolen before the scam was detected.

Industrial espionage: Next-level social engineering

Cybercriminals use deepfakes to infiltrate organizations without arousing suspicion. In 2023, for instance, hackers impersonated the head of R&D at a U.S. technology company using a deepfake video, holding fake online meetings with engineers and gathering confidential information about prototypes the firm was developing.

Disinformation: Immediate reputational and financial fallout

At the end of 2023, a deepfake video showing a CEO making alarming statements about the state of the economy caused the company’s stock value to plummet. The scam was uncovered just a few hours later, but the financial impact amounted to millions of dollars. This kind of digital fraud poses a direct threat to the stability of businesses and financial markets.

Bypassing security systems: Leaving defenses vulnerable

Some deepfakes can fool biometric authentication systems, with ultra-realistic imitations duping the facial and voice recognition technologies used in advanced security protocols, thus putting sensitive data at risk.  In 2023, a British journalist demonstrated how deepfakes could defeat voice recognition-based security systems, using just a short sample of his voice to produce an imitation that tricked his bank’s security system into allowing access to his account.

Bank fraud: Fake Italian minister scams business community

In 2024, scammers used AI-powered voice cloning technology to imitate Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto. Posing as the minister, they demanded several million euros in funds to secure the release of journalists held abroad. Their targets included Armani, Moratti, the Beretta family, and Menarini. One of the victims reportedly transferred nearly $1 million before the scam was exposed.

Who do deepfakes target and why?

Some individuals, teams, and sectors are naturally more vulnerable to deepfake scams because they have an extensive digital footprint or engage in sensitive activities. However, as is often the case in cybersecurity, no business can ever consider itself completely safe.

Executives and senior management

CEOs, CFOs, and CIOs are prime targets. Their voices and images can easily be found in interviews and speeches, allowing scammers to create highly convincing deepfakes and giving them fake authority to authorize transfers, announce false strategic decisions, or request sensitive information.

Finance and accounting teams

Departments that handle payments are frequently targeted. Using the cloned voice of a senior executive, hackers can urgently request a change of bank details or approve an exceptional transfer of funds, bypassing standard procedures.

Banks and insurance companies

In industries where trust is paramount, scammers exploit urgency bias to gain access to funds. For instance, a criminal could get hold of sensitive data by posing as an auditor from a regulatory body, or leverage stolen customer information to trick policyholders into transferring money to fraudulent accounts.

Manufacturers and industrial firms

Aside from financial fraud, companies in this sector are particularly exposed to industrial espionage. By impersonating a colleague or expert, an attacker can infiltrate project meetings and gain access to highly sensitive data such as prototypes and trade secrets. This stolen information can then be resold, used for blackmail, or exploited by competitors.

Retail and luxury goods sector

In the retail and luxury goods sector, deepfakes are used both for scams and to lend an air of legitimacy to counterfeit goods. Videos featuring cloned influencers can make fake product launches on marketplaces appear credible, while doctored ads can direct customers to mirror sites selling counterfeit goods. The impact is twofold, with immediate financial losses and long-term erosion of brand value.

How to spot a deepfake?

Cybersecurity analyst in front of a wall of data screens in a server room

What are the warning signs of a deepfake? 

Although the underlying technology is becoming more advanced, deepfakes are by no means undetectable. There are a number of telltale visual and audio clues to look out for. These are detailed below.

Clue 1: Unusual or inconsistent facial expressions

  • Irregular blinking: An MIT study found that many deepfakes feature irregular blinking, or even a complete absence of blinking. This is because AI models are often trained on static images where subjects’ eyes are open. While newer models improve on this, some still struggle to reproduce natural blinking.
  • Facial asymmetry: Small imperfections such as a crooked smile, a slightly misaligned gaze, or a nose that appears distorted are often signs of AI-generated content.
  • Stiff or artificial facial expressions: Micro-expressions are critical to human communication, but AI still struggles to replicate them accurately. A face that appears too stiff or that changes expression abruptly can be a sign of a deepfake.

Clue 2: Mismatch between audio and lip movements

  • Poor lip-sync alignment: A 2022 IEEE study revealed a recurring flaw in deepfakes: lip movements don’t always match the sounds being produced, especially when it comes to complex words. This misalignment can sometimes be brushed off as a network quality or latency issue, but it’s often a giveaway.
  • Unnatural-sounding intonation: AI-generated voices can sound flat or emotionally off. According to DeepMind researchers, some deepfakes lack the natural variations in tone that characterize human speech, giving them a slightly robotic quality.

But as AI models evolve, and as impersonators practice mimicking their targets, these imperfections are becoming harder to detect.

Clue 3: Inconsistent lighting and shadows

  • Abnormal reflections and shadows: The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft research institute has identified a common giveaway in deepfakes: abnormal reflections in the eyes or glasses, or shadows that fall in the wrong direction. Inconsistencies like these often point to AI-enabled manipulation.
  • Blurring or flickering: According to Microsoft Research, deepfakes can feature dynamic blurring or flickering effects, especially during fast movements, creating a sense of visual instability.

Clue 4: Unnatural textures and details

  • Skin that looks too smooth or overly detailed: An artificially flawless complexion, with no pores and no imperfections, can be a clear sign of a deepfake.
  • Poorly rendered hair and ears: AI still struggles to render hair naturally. Common issues include inconsistent strands, blurred hairlines, and ears that appear distorted or misaligned with the rest of the face.

Clue 5: Digital artifacts and image instability

  • Movements around the edges of the face: When a deepfake isn’t rendered properly, distortions often appear around the edges of the face, especially when the person makes quick movements.
  • Shaking or morphing: If the image is unstable, or there are subtle changes in facial proportions, this can be a sign of deepfake.

Tools for detecting deepfakes

As deepfakes become more sophisticated, various technologies have emerged for identifying manipulated content, drawing on AI, metadata analysis, and advanced content certification.

AI detection tools

AI-powered tools examine videos and images frame by frame, spotting anomalies that are invisible to the naked eye, such as inconsistencies in pixels, reflections, and shadows. Others use databases of synthetic content to become better at recognizing manipulated content created by advanced machine-learning models.

Blockchain and content certification

Another approach involves certifying content at the point of creation. These methods guarantee authenticity by embedding an unalterable digital fingerprint in images and videos. Metadata are also incorporated into multimedia files for traceability purposes.

Biometric and behavioral analysis

Monitoring facial movements and expressions is another effective way to flag deepfakes. AI models trained on human behavior analyze facial movements to detect any distortions that could indicate manipulation. Some deep-learning systems can even identify artifacts that are invisible to the human eye.

Audio detection and hybrid approaches

Deepfakes aren’t limited to visual content. Synthetic voices also pose a serious risk. Specialized algorithms analyze sound frequencies, prosody, and intonation patterns to detect telltale signs that a piece of content has been manipulated. When combined with facial and gesture recognition, these methods provide a more complete picture of potential fraud.

While these tools represent significant progress, they are not foolproof, which is why awareness remains a key factor in preventing users from falling victim to deepfakes.

Protecting against deepfakes: Strategies and best practices

Two programmers looking at code on computer screens

Training your people to stay alert

Awareness is the first line of defense against deepfakes. Companies need to train their people to spot subtle warning signs and adopt sound verification practices. Implementing double-checking protocols—such as confirming a sensitive request through a separate communication channel—can significantly reduce risk. Measure like these should be embedded in internal, organization-wide procedures and automated wherever possible to ensure they are followed consistently.

Simulations and drills can help employees recognize attempted fraud and build a habit of systematic verification.

It’s equally important to have employees double-check both audio and video content as a matter of routine. Encouraging staff to question unusual requests and confirm them via a separate channel, such as a direct phone call or an internal email, can help prevent fraud.

Building hands-on exercises, tests, and simulations into your organization’s cybersecurity policies ensures your people are ready if a deepfake attack happens.

Securing communication channels and decision-making processes

Individual staff alertness is important. But businesses also need to safeguard their communication and decision-making processes. Implementing robust validation protocols helps prevent impersonation attempts that could compromise financial transactions or strategic decisions.

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) should be implemented as standard for all sensitive communications. Because when it comes to checking someone’s identity, a simple email or phone call is no longer enough. Advanced solutions like biometric authentication and digital certificates offer an extra layer of security.

Internal processes should also include additional checkpoints. For example, requests for fund transfers or changes to sensitive data should be confirmed by multiple sources through independent channels.

Secure communication measures should also extend to outside partners, who need to be trained in best practices to reduce exploitable vulnerabilities.

Anticipate and adapt to evolving deepfake threats

Deepfakes are constantly improving, making detection increasingly difficult. Businesses need to be proactive, regularly updating their cybersecurity strategies to keep risks to a minimum.

Robust technology watch processes are essential, because organizations that keep abreast of the latest developments in deepfake creation and detection are best-placed to adjust their protective systems. Collaborating with cybersecurity experts, researchers, and specialized organizations can help business anticipate new attack techniques.

But technology isn’t the only safeguard. Staff also need to be trained to recognize warning signs, including through regular exercises that sharpen their instincts and prevent them from responding impulsively to unusual requests. Companies that develop a strong cyber culture ensure that best practices are embedded in their day-to-day operations.

Retailers see it every day: customers expect smoother, more relevant experiences that are tailored to their preferences. But in reality, few organizations have the tools, coordination, and especially the data needed to meet this demand.

Personalization cannot be decreed; it must be built through interactions, weak signals, and the ability to activate data at the right time, on the right channel. This means going beyond classic segmentation or generic campaigns.

Some approaches already in use in retail demonstrate how to leverage data without complicating the customer journey. Through four key trends, new, more refined, reactive, and behaviorally aligned personalization methods are emerging.

Personne tenant une tablette dans un magazin

Data for personalization: an underused potential in retail?

Why is personalization becoming a top priority for customers?

Expectations for personalized experiences keep growing. Today, 73% of customers expect brands to understand their needs and offer tailor-made interactions. And this demand isn’t just a marketing “plus”: it directly influences purchasing decisions. Nearly 78% of consumers are more likely to repurchase from a company that personalizes their experience.

But this desire for personalization is not always met. Only 15% of CMOs believe they are on the right track. This gap creates a huge opportunity for retailers. And the stakes are strategic: relevant personalization increases customer loyalty by 49%.

Conversely, poorly targeted efforts can damage brand image. Nearly a quarter of consumers report receiving recommendations for products they’ve already bought. This misstep creates a counterproductive effect by reinforcing the sense of disconnected marketing. In other words, an impersonal customer experience makes a brand invisible to the consumer.

What role does data play in enhancing the customer experience?

To meet these expectations, retailers now have a key lever: data. Every interaction (browsing, purchases, campaign responses, etc.) feeds a base of information that, when used correctly, helps refine customer journeys without adding friction.

En amont, elle aide à comprendre les intentions : pages consultées, recherches, interactions sociales… Ces signaux permettent d’adapter les contenus ou les offres, parfois dès la première visite. 

Upstream, it helps identify intent: pages viewed, searches made, social interactions… These signals allow content or offers to be adapted sometimes from the first visit.

During the purchase, it simplifies the journey: product suggestions based on preferences, anticipated delivery options, integrated advice online or in-store.

After the purchase, it enables more relevant engagement: useful recommendations, targeted follow-ups, content tailored to context or history.

The goal is not to personalize everything, but to do so where it makes sense. It’s not the amount of data that creates value, but the right activation at the right moment.

Behavioral segmentation: from traditional profiling to real-time activation

Segmenting customers by age or average basket size is still useful… but far from sufficient. Such static segmentation doesn’t reflect behavior evolution or real-time signals.

Today, the most agile brands are shifting to dynamic segmentations fueled by real-time data. Every click, search, or cart addition becomes a usable signal. It’s no longer about static profiles, but continuously updated observed actions.

Tools like Customer Data Platforms (CDPs) unify data from various channels (web, mobile, in-store). The result: a customer can automatically join a “high intent” segment after viewing a product multiple times, or be removed from an active segment after a period of inactivity.  

Conversational AI: from chatbots to self-learning smart agents

In retail, conversational agents have made major strides. We’ve moved far beyond basic scripts offering canned responses. Today, powered by AI, some bots understand natural language, detect customer intent, and tailor responses based on history and preferences.

This adaptability depends directly on data. Every question asked, every choice made, every past interaction enriches their learning base. The richer and better-structured the data, the more precise and relevant the conversational AI becomes.

Brands use these bots for both customer service and sales support. Order tracking, product choices, cart help: these bots handle more and more interactions especially during busy periods or outside business hours while still offering a satisfying level of personalization.

Smart automation: when CRM data meets the right signals

Effective marketing automation hinges on one thing: connecting what you know about a customer to what they’re doing now. This is exactly what happens when CRM data is combined with behavioral signals.

CRM data provides structure: loyalty status, declared preferences, purchase history. Add to this recent behaviors: browsing categories, abandoned carts, prolonged inactivity. Combining both enables personalized actions to be triggered without human intervention. These automations go beyond email: brands activate mobile push notifications, SMS, personalized web content, even in-store messages. Each channel is used based on context and customer profile.

When CRM and behavioral data are synchronized across channels, the result is a unified customer view. The ability to activate the right data at the right time, with the right message, is what makes real-time behavioral segmentation meaningful. CDPs help by collecting and unifying data from various sources to ensure optimal personalization. And the performance results speak for themselves: open rates, clicks, and conversions all rise significantly when messages are triggered by real behavior—not a calendar.

Selling without pushing: product recommendations put to the test

Recommendation engines analyze shopping and browsing behavior to suggest the most relevant products based on a customer’s profile. Two methods are often combined: suggesting what similar customers bought, or showcasing items related to previously viewed products.

These systems draw on diverse data: past purchases, viewed products, cart additions, declared preferences… plus broader trends from all users. Some models even include predictive logic: if a customer replaces their sneakers every 18 months, the algorithm can anticipate a new purchase around that time.

In e-commerce, these recommendations appear directly on pages: personalized carousels, post-purchase suggestions, targeted emails. In-store, some retailers test systems via tablets, sales associates, or interactive kiosks connected to the customer profile, replicating the personalization logic in a physical space.

But the benefits go beyond single transactions. A recommendation aligned with the customer’s tastes strengthens the sense of brand closeness. Over time, this relevance drives loyalty, especially if suggestions are integrated into the relationship journey: post-purchase emails, mobile app alerts, notifications about new collections aligned with preferences.

The more accurate the recommendations, the less they feel intrusive and the more they are perceived as a service rather than a sales tactic. This balance is key to the long-term effectiveness of these tools.

Retail & Data: what constraints should be anticipated during implementation?

These innovations require some precautions. First, from the customer experience perspective: if personalization is too obvious or poorly explained, it can be poorly received. It is essential to inform users and let them manage their preferences.

From a regulatory standpoint, the phasing out of third-party cookies is pushing brands to build their own databases: customer accounts, mobile apps, loyalty programs. These sources will be crucial to maintain individualized relationships.

Finally, to use these tools daily, teams must be trained, engaged, and properly equipped. The challenge isn’t technological it’s organizational: ensuring data flows freely, uses are clear, and every role sees a tangible benefit in their work.

AI, a new strategic advantage to improve company performance

Why educate your company about artificial intelligence? Far from being a mere tool, artificial intelligence is now a vital strategic advantage that improves a company’s performance. For senior management, AI has the potential to become a new strategic resource for rapid and better-informed decision-making, based on data and in-depth analysis.

How AI optimizes performance and strengthens the competitiveness of companies that understand the technology

Artificial intelligence provides a major advantage in terms of optimizing operational performance through the automation of complex processes, far beyond traditional automation.

Let’s take the claims handling process of a health insurance company as an example. This process comprises several stages, including checking the customer’s personal file and analyzing their request, and can lead to various measures, such as recovering missing documents and estimating the amount to be reimbursed. Generative AI can fully automate this process, because the tool interprets requests, has knowledge of contracts, is familiar with procedures and can resolve issues at each stage of the process in a logical way. The result? More accurate, more reliable and considerably faster management that improves customer satisfaction.

Automation is just one of the advantages offered by AI. Through predictive analysis, it can anticipate customer needs and improve competitiveness. As part of the claims handling process, predictive analysis can, for example, identify a customer who frequently claims reimbursements for alternative medical care. In this case, AI can suggest a customized insurance policy with better reimbursement for alternative medicine. By combining this ability to anticipate with the automation of tasks including report generation, AI enhances competitiveness and improves the customer experience.

Ultimately, this combination leads to optimized performance, better management of internal processes and increased customization of services in a constantly changing environment.

Educating senior management about artificial intelligence to improve strategic decision-making

Generative AI is a valuable strategic asset in the decision-making process. Senior management can rely on AI systems to rapidly provide precise and actionable insights. The large-scale data mining of internal data (sales history, stock, marketing performance indicators, turnover rate, etc.) and external data (global events, new environmental regulations, etc.), provides precise analysis and recommendations, based on real information. By cross-referencing this data, AI helps identify trends and detect opportunities that humans couldn’t spot in such a short space of time. 

These tools help make companies more agile as they can make decisions that are based on data and are better aligned with market realities. They offer invaluable support to senior management when it comes to anticipating future challenges and maximizing current performance.

Threats posed by a lack of education about AI

Companies that fail to recognize the importance of artificial intelligence are exposed to significant risks, including technological lag, a loss of competitiveness and a growing divide between business and technology. These threats can limit their ability to innovate and adapt to fast-changing market conditions.

Educating your company about AI: the key to avoiding technological lag and staying competitive

Companies that are slow to adopt artificial intelligence risk falling behind in terms of technology. While some organizations have already implemented AI use cases and are reaping the initial benefits, others that are reluctant to take the plunge could soon be left behind. This inertia can lead to reduced competitiveness, particularly in sectors in which agility and innovation are crucial to be able to meet customer expectations and keep pace with market trends. AI makes it possible to adjust strategies in real time, adapting to consumer needs and industry innovations. Companies that leverage its potential therefore enjoy a significant competitive advantage. Conversely, ignoring these technologies can result in significant opportunity costs. Companies risk missing out on new growth opportunities and limiting themselves in comparison with more agile competitors.

In retail, for instance, specifically in e-commerce, generative AI has a wide range of applications, including optimizing marketplace visibility, accelerating launches and fine-tuning delivery routes for greater speed and lower CO2 emissions. Retailers can use these technologies to improve customer satisfaction while increasing their return on investment (ROI).

The digital divide: how education about AI can reconnect business and technology

Artificial intelligence (AI) is profoundly transforming companies, but a lack of familiarity with this technology can create a digital divide between businesses and tools. Without a clear understanding of the challenges and opportunities that AI presents, teams will struggle to integrate these new technologies in their day-to-day processes. This will hamper the adoption of artificial intelligence and, consequently, lead to a technological lag within the organization. What’s more, this unfamiliarity can lead to mistrust among employees, exacerbating internal resistance.

This disconnect is primarily caused by a lack of adequate training, leaving employees out of step with market expectations. A company’s Executive Committee has a key role to play in this digital transformation. By educating senior management first, followed by operational teams, companies can ensure that their business objectives align with technological innovations and can also better anticipate market developments.

Raising senior management’s awareness of AI: key to the digital transformation

Educating a company about artificial intelligence (AI) is not just about implementing cutting-edge technologies. It is vital to understand that the successful adoption of artificial intelligence requires a thorough understanding of its implications, particularly in terms of security, ethics and compliance.

Protecting the company from cyberthreats and ensuring regulatory compliance

AI can strengthen cybersecurity by actively detecting potential threats. By analyzing vast volumes of data in real time, it identifies suspect behavior and enables companies to act before a cyberattack occurs. However, integrating these technologies also presents risks if they are not properly understood. For example, vulnerabilities can appear if the data processed by AI is poorly protected or if the processes for the storage and use of data to train AI models aren’t transparent.

In addition to its role in threat detection, AI must be managed to ensure strict compliance with data protection regulations, including the European Union’s AI Act. This regulatory framework establishes stringent requirements as to how AI systems must process and store data, particularly sensitive data. Companies that fail to manage these aspects are exposed to cyberthreats and also run the risk of financial penalties and reputational damage in the event of non-compliance.

It is therefore vital for senior management to understand that although AI is a powerful tool that can enhance security, it can also lead to a security breach if security protocols are not rigorously enforced. Educating senior management teams about the specific risks associated with AI, including data management and algorithm transparency, is vital to ensure the responsible use of this technology, while maximizing its performance in the fight against cyberthreats.

Identifying relevant use cases

Educating people about artificial intelligence involves more than just understanding the technology and should include an exploration of its practical applications. AI provides a wide range of possibilities in terms of automation, analysis, customization and prediction. By focusing on these capabilities, companies can identify use cases that are suited to their needs. Involving management teams from the earliest stages of a company’s AI transformation is vital to speed up the process and create momentum within the organization.

Senior management must play a key role in this process by launching initiatives to familiarize all teams with AI. Brainstorming sessions, group workshops and AI hackathons can be organized to encourage innovation and identify specific solutions. Executive management must demonstrate leadership to instill this dynamic and ensure the consistent adoption of AI at all levels of the company.

Ensuring an ethical and responsible approach

Despite its benefits, artificial intelligence can unintentionally introduce biases into algorithms. To prevent this, it is vital to ensure that every recommendation produced by AI is justifiable and understandable. Educating people about AI helps identify and correct these biases to ensure ethical and transparent use. This ensures that processes and decisions are managed in a transparent way and align with the company’s objectives.

The education of senior management teams plays a key role in the adoption of AI. By understanding the risks linked to algorithmic bias and the improper use of data, senior management can better manage the use of these technologies. Senior management must ensure that processes using AI are understandable and that automated decisions can be justified at any time. Not only does this strengthen employee trust in this tool, it also ensures that AI is a well-managed strategic resource, rather than a source of biased or misinterpreted decisions.

Artificial intelligence is a strategic advantage for companies, but different kinds of AI fulfill different needs. With so many solutions available, a strategic choice often has to be made between the creativity of generative AI and the analytical precision of predictive AI.

How do they work? What practical uses do they have? What are the criteria for making the right choice? Analysis.

Generative AI: creative automation for companies

Definition and how it works

Generative AI is a technology that can produce original content using the data available to it. More specifically, it can write texts, create images, generate videos and compose music.

It works using deep learning models, trained with huge volumes of data to identify patterns and generate consistent results. For example, these models can understand how words string together to form coherent sentences and how shapes and colors come together in an image to determine its structure.

Principle characteristics of generative AI:

  • Automation of content creation.
  • Use of deep neural networks.
  • Production of results from specific instructions (prompts).
  • Improvement through continuous learning (fine-tuning and human feedback).

Generative AI: large-scale but controlled creativity

Generative AI is a major step forward in the automation of content creation, but companies must develop a well thought-out approach when using it. Although it has significant potential in terms of productivity and customization, it also raises questions with regard to the quality of its results and the biased nature of its models.

AdvantagesLimitations
Automation of time-consuming tasks: writing texts, generating images, creating videos.Risk of incorrect or biased content: AI can generate incorrect information (“hallucinations”) and reflect prejudices in its training data. It can also be used to create fake news by means of deepfakes (falsified content, such as fake videos using someone’s image or voice to simulate a fictitious situation), for example.
Advanced customization: tailoring content to specific customer segments.Dependence on training data: the quality of the generated content is highly dependent on the databases used.
Accelerated innovation: assistance with the development of new products or services.
Accessibility: simplified use via no-code tools (e.g. ChatGPT, MidJourney).

Beyond these technical aspects, there are also important ethical issues. Given that generative AI can produce incorrect or discriminatory results, it raises questions of security and trust. These issues have led to the development of legal frameworks, including the AI Act in Europe, to provide a framework for these promising but potentially sensitive technologies.

What use cases for generative AI?

Much more than just a technical tool, generative AI is part of a strategic approach that can transform business processes.

Increased productivity

By automating time-consuming tasks, generative AI frees up time for staff to work on other things, while enhancing process reliability. For example:

  • In insurance, it can automatically generate customized contracts, reducing human error.
  • In marketing, it can provide tailored campaigns for each audience, accelerating strategy implementation.

In addition to speeding up tasks, it also ensures better quality and provides measurable results.

Large-scale customization

Generative AI transforms customer interactions by providing bespoke content and seamless communication that is perfectly tailored to the specific needs of each user. For example:

  • In the luxury and e-commerce sectors, in which customization is vital, it can generate highly targeted product recommendations, strengthening customer engagement and satisfaction.
  • For health insurance companies, an AI-enhanced chatbot can respond to customers 24/7, with natural, accurate communications, reducing waiting time and operational costs.

These solutions improve the user experience while improving conversion rates to combine efficiency and differentiation, particularly in competitive markets.

Support for innovation

Generative AI plays a key role in innovation cycles, quickly generating prototypes, designs and even functional models. Companies can use it to test various iterations of a product or service before moving on to the production phase, reducing lead times and associated costs.

  • In manufacturing, it can design bespoke parts and optimize manufacturing processes, such as the design of complex industrial components and innovative packaging.
  • When it comes to services, it can support the development of bespoke solutions by automating the creation of training scenarios and generating user paths for digital tools.

By providing more flexibility and considerable time savings, generative AI improves a company’s ability to provide innovative products and services that reflect customer expectations.

Employees focused on added value

Generative AI frees teams from the most repetitive tasks, such as data entry and the production of standardized content, so that they can focus on tasks with significant added value.

  • For example, marketing teams can focus on strategy and performance analysis, while AI produces basic content or initial creative suggestions.
  • In human resources, it can automate the processes of drafting job advertisements and answering candidates’ frequently asked questions, leaving more time for staff to engage in more substantive interactions.

This reduces their operational workload and makes their work more meaningful. These solutions help improve employee engagement and well-being.

Predictive AI: anticipating for better decision-making

Definition and how it works

Unlike generative AI, predictive AI doesn’t create new content; instead, it analyzes existing data to anticipate trends, detect risks and optimize resources.

Like generative AI, predictive AI is based on automatic learning models, but it uses data to identify patterns and relationships. It uses statistical and automatic learning models that can identify recurring patterns in large-scale data sets.

Once the model has been trained to recognize patterns in data, it can generate predictions using new information. These models are regularly updated with new data to ensure they remain relevant and accurate.

Principle characteristics of predictive AI:

  • Generates predictions using historical data.
  • Based on algorithms including regression, random forests and neural networks.
  • Structured data analysis to identify correlation.
  • Generates predictions based on new data sets.

Predictive AI: a powerful strategic tool that presents challenges

Predictive AI can be used to anticipate events, identify trends and adapt responses accordingly. Companies can use it for recommendations that are based on precise analysis to facilitate decision-making.

AdvantagesLimitations
Reduced uncertainties: more informed decision-making, based on quantified predictions.Dependence on historical data: if the data is incomplete or biased, forecasts will be flawed.
Resource optimization: stock management, adjusted staffing levels, budget forecasts.Difficulty in interpreting models: some predictions come from “black boxes” that are difficult to explain to decision makers.
Early risk detection: anticipating technical failures, preventing financial fraud.Expensive to implement: robust infrastructure and expertise in data science are required.

Although predictive AI is a powerful driver of performance, it requires a thorough approach and its results must be interpreted in a transparent way. These weaknesses highlight the importance of transparency. To ensure trust and accountability, it is vital that people can approve and justify decisions taken by AI. This requires a perfect understanding of the tools used.

What use cases for predictive AI?

With its analytical and anticipatory capabilities, predictive AI gives companies a competitive advantage by helping them make more informed decisions. This approach, focused on analysis and forecasting, is a strategic asset for many sectors.

Optimized resource management

By using predictive models, companies can anticipate their needs and adjust their resources accordingly:

  • In the logistics sector, it can analyze variables including customer demand, the weather and major events (sales, holidays, sports competitions). AI can help adjust stock levels and avoid shortages or overstocking.
  • In human resources, it can anticipate staffing needs and optimize schedules, particularly in the health sector and industry, where poor team management can impact service quality.

En structurant la gestion des ressources sur des prévisions fiables, les entreprises gagnent en efficacité et réduisent les coûts liés aux déséquilibres d’approvisionnement ou de main-d’œuvre.

Reduced costs through prevention

Predictive AI identifies recurring patterns to detect anomalies and prevent incidents, thereby limiting financial losses caused by breakdowns, fraud and other risks:

  • In industry, it is used for predictive maintenance. By analyzing data from IoT sensors, it can anticipate machine failures and facilitate intervention before a breakdown causes a production shutdown.
  • In insurance, it can identify high-risk profiles and suggest suitable coverage. It is also useful in the detection of fraud, identifying suspicious behavior when claims and requests for reimbursement are made.

By integrating predictive AI, companies strengthen their ability to prevent incidents and reduce the costs associated with failures and fraud.

An enhanced customer experience

By analyzing consumer behavior, predictive AI can improve the customer experience and strengthen engagement, particularly in the retail sector:

  • Detecting churn (customer disengagement) enables companies to identify the weak signals that suggest that a customer is at risk of leaving. Targeted initiatives, such as customized promotional offers, can then be implemented to retain these customers.
  • Predictive recommendations improve product suggestions, based on consumer habits and preferences, thereby increasing customer satisfaction and sales.

By anticipating customer expectations, predictive AI enables companies to adopt a proactive approach and improve customer loyalty.

A tool for the energy transition

Predictive AI also contributes to environmental performance by optimizing resource management and reducing waste:

  • In manufacturing, it can be used to adapt machinery use, based on spikes in energy consumption, and anticipate unsold items to adjust production, thereby limiting overproduction and waste.
  • In the transport sector, it can plan more efficient routes, thereby reducing the fuel consumption and the carbon footprint of these journeys.

Combining economic performance and environmental responsibility, predictive AI is a strategic asset for companies committed to the energy transition.

How to choose between generative AI and predictive AI? Two complementary approaches for companies

Although they share the same principles (data analysis, machine learning), generative AI and predictive AI meet different needs.

  • Generative AI is designed to automate content creation and customize interactions with customers. It is ideal for companies that want to produce quality content quickly, improve customer engagement or accelerate innovation.
  • Predictive AI, meanwhile, analyzes existing data to anticipate trends, detect risks and optimize resources. It is vital for companies that need to make strategic decisions based on reliable forecasts.

Strategic complementarity

Rather than choosing between these two approaches, many companies take advantage of their synergies.

Case in point: An e-commerce company can use generative AI to automatically write engaging product descriptions, while using predictive AI to anticipate purchasing trends and optimize its inventory accordingly.

How to make the right choice?

Your needsAppropriate technology
Automating content creation and customizing the customer experience?Generative AI
Optimizing decision-making and anticipating trends?Predictive AI
Combining customization and advanced analysis to maximize performance?Both technologies

A comparison of generative AI vs. predictive AI

CriteriaGenerative AIPredictive AI
Primary objectiveProducing original content (texts, images, videos, etc.).Anticipating future trends and behaviors.
Technologies usedDeep learning, advanced neural networks.Statistical models, regression, neural networks.
Data usedTraining data used to generate new content.Historical data analyzed to provide forecasts.
Examples of applicationsChatbots, content marketing generation, document automation.Sales forecasts, inventory management, customer risk detection.
Added valueInnovation, customization and automation of creative processes.Optimizing decision-making and reducing uncertainties.

Rather than being competing solutions, generative AI and predictive AI are complementary tools. Depending on its objectives, a company can opt for one or the other, or even combine the two to maximize performance and competitiveness.

If cybercriminals are becoming increasingly ingenious in bypassing defense systems, their target remains the same: humans. Far from being solely a technological issue, cybersecurity also depends on employees’ ability to adopt the right reflexes in the face of threats. However, our brains, designed for immediate physical dangers, struggle to grasp abstract risks like cyberattacks. This is where neuroscience provides valuable insights to understand and reduce human errors in cybersecurity.

The human factor at the heart of cyberattacks: between errors and cognitive biases

The human factor at the heart of cyberattacks 

Despite massive investment in defense technologies (anti-phishing filters, firewalls, advanced detection solutions), human error remains a prime entry point for cybercriminals. Estimates vary depending on the source: between 75% and 95% of cyber incidents originate from human failure.

This phenomenon can be explained by the multitude of risky behaviors, including:

These cognitive biases that make us vulnerable

Human vulnerability to cyber threats largely stems from several cognitive biases. Our decisions are influenced by unconscious mechanisms embedded in the way our brain functions, which distort our ability to assess risk and make rational choices. These biases lead to risky behaviors that, if not corrected, can result in security breaches exploitable by attackers:

Neuroscience and human error: why does our brain trick us?

The intuitive functioning of the brain in the face of cyber threats

According to the work of psychologist Daniel Kahneman, our brain operates using two modes of thinking:

When facing cyber threats, System 1 is primarily activated, as employees often react under pressure or out of habit. However, while this intuitive system is well-suited for responding quickly to physical dangers, it is ill-adapted to complex and abstract digital risks. This dominance of intuitive thinking explains why, despite training, employees may make simple errors, such as clicking on a fraudulent link.

Cybercriminals exploit this natural reflex by designing attacks that trigger urgency and emotions. For example, an email with the subject line “Your account will be suspended within 24 hours” prompts a rapid response, reducing rational thinking and increasing the likelihood of a successful attack.

The impact of emotions, stress, and cognitive overload

Beyond cognitive biases, several factors contribute to human errors, including stress, cognitive overload, and negative emotions:

Real-world example: cognitive overload in a phishing attack

An employee, in the middle of a busy workday, receives a fraudulent email with the subject: “Login issue detected – Please verify your credentials”.

The email appears legitimate, featuring a familiar corporate logo and a professional tone.

Under pressure, between two meetings and dealing with urgent tasks, the employee fails to carefully analyze the email. The message mentions an urgent problem and includes a link to click on to “prevent service disruption.”

With their brain overwhelmed by a flood of information and sometimes contradictory instructions, they instinctively choose a quick response over careful verification.

The link leads to a perfect replica of their company’s login page. Believing the request is genuine, they enter their credentials. As a result, the attackers gain access to their account, compromising the company’s information system.

This example highlights how cognitive overload, combined with biases like urgency and familiarity, can lead employees to bypass basic security checks and make critical mistakes.

How to use neuroscience to counter human error in cybersecurity?

Establishing an effective cybersecurity culture requires continuous action on multiple fronts:

Awareness Tailored to Cognitive Mechanisms

Neuroscience demonstrates that to capture attention and correct cognitive biases, cybersecurity messages must be adapted to the way the human brain processes information. Traditional training often too dense and theoretical tends to overload memory and disengage employees.

To ensure effectiveness, training content should be:

Learning through experience: simulations & real-world scenarios

The brain learns best through direct experience, making it essential to immerse employees in realistic cybersecurity scenarios. Simulations create a controlled environment where employees can confront cyber threats without real consequences.

These exercises help identify risky reflexes and reinforce good behaviors. Moreover, by experiencing an error without real consequences, employees retain the lessons learned more effectively.

Repetition and reinforcement to instill good reflexes

Since cognitive biases are deeply embedded in the brain’s functioning, a single awareness session is not enough. It is necessary to:

Overcoming obstacles linked to cultural perceptions

In certain cultural contexts, risk management is often seen as an administrative constraint. This attitude, particularly prevalent in Southern Europe, may explain why some companies are slow to adopt strong preventive measures. This weak risk culture is exploited by attackers, who know that the organizations concerned rarely take precautions before suffering an attack.

To overcome this obstacle, it is crucial to highlight the importance of anticipating threats by demonstrating that cybersecurity is not an unnecessary expense but a vital strategic approach. Sharing concrete examples of threats that were avoided thanks to vigilance can help shift perceptions and encourage teams to adopt a proactive stance.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the economy, but its rapid rise comes with major risks, ranging from discriminatory biases to violations of fundamental rights. To address these challenges, the European Union has introduced the AI Act, a strict regulation designed to oversee the use of AI while ensuring the protection of citizens.

Why regulate AI?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents a significant opportunity for businesses, with applications ranging from the automation of repetitive tasks to large-scale data analysis. However, its deployment raises major concerns regarding fairness and security.

Limiting discriminatory biases and protecting fundamental ights 

AI systems can reproduce and amplify discriminatory biases, whether due to the data used or the design choices of algorithms. These biases, whether implicit or explicit, pose a significant problem when AI is applied in critical areas such as recruitment or performance evaluation. A common example is the incorrect association between income and job performance, reflecting historical discriminations with no factual basis.

These risks of algorithmic injustice call for regulation to protect fundamental rights such as privacy and equal treatment. It is crucial to ensure that AI systems do not become tools of discrimination or violations of citizens’ rights.

Ensuring the security and reliability of critical systems

AI systems also raise security concerns, particularly those used in critical fields such as healthcare, autonomous vehicles, or the justice system. This means that malfunctions can have serious consequences for people’s safety and lives. Beyond functional risks, AI system security must also account for cyberattacks, such as “data poisoning,” where data is manipulated to influence outcomes.

Since AI is often perceived as a black box, understanding and explaining how certain decisions are made becomes challenging. This lack of transparency raises accountability issues, making it even more essential to implement regulations that promote the explainability of AI systems.

What is the AI Act?

The AI Act is a European regulation designed to oversee the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. In response to the rapid growth of AI and increasing concerns about risks to fundamental rights, this legislation establishes strict governance to prevent potential abuses.

This regulation applies not only to companies based in the European Union but also to any foreign company wishing to sell or distribute AI systems within the EU. As a result, any entity that designs, develops, deploys, or markets AI systems in the European market is subject to the AI Act, even if it operates outside the EU.

Main objectives of the AI Act: security, ethics, and controlled Innovation

Classification of AI systems by risk level

To achieve its objectives, the AI Act classifies AI systems into four categories based on their level of risk:

This classification allows legal obligations to be adjusted according to the level of risk associated with each AI application.

What are the implications for businesses?


The AI Act imposes new legal obligations on businesses, particularly regarding compliance, documentation, and monitoring of AI systems. These requirements vary depending on the risk level associated with each system.

Compliance with the AI Act: risk management and audits

For high-risk systems, companies must implement risk management processes, conduct regular audits, and ensure algorithmic transparency. The goal is to make AI-driven decisions understandable and justifiable, thereby strengthening user trust, especially in sensitive areas such as healthcare and human resources.

AI system documentation: A requirement to prove compliance

Businesses must prepare for increased documentation requirements. Each AI system must be accompanied by detailed documentation proving its compliance with regulatory standards. This documentation will include:

Specific responsibilities based on business roles

The implications of the AI Act vary depending on a company’s role in the AI development and deployment chain:

Penalties for non-compliance

Failure to comply with the AI Act exposes businesses to financial penalties of up to 6% of their global annual revenue. This is comparable to fines under the GDPR, highlighting the EU’s commitment to preventing AI-related abuses.

Beyond financial sanctions, non-compliant companies risk market bans on their AI-based products or services. Such restrictions could have significant economic consequences, blocking access to the European market—one of the largest in the world.

Additionally, non-compliance can severely damage a company’s reputation. In industries affecting fundamental rights (such as privacy and discrimination), failing to meet regulatory requirements could result in a loss of customer and partner trust, ultimately harming long-term competitiveness.